Situational Leadership
The situational theory of leadership suggests
that no single leadership style is best. Instead, it all depends on the
situation at hand and which type of leadership and strategies are best-suited
to the task. According to this theory, the most effective leaders are those
that are able to adapt their style to the situation and look at cues such as
the type of task, the nature of the group, and other factors that might
contribute to getting the job done.
Situational leadership theory is often referred to as the
Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory, after its developers, Dr. Paul
Hersey, author of "The Situational Leader," and Kenneth Blanchard,
author of "One-Minute Manager."
Hersey and Blanchard’s
Leadership Styles
Hersey and Blanchard suggested that there are four
primary leadership styles:
- Telling
(S1): In this
leadership style, the leader tells people what to do and how to do it.
- Selling
(S2): This style
involves more back-and-forth between leaders and followers. Leaders
"sell" their ideas and message to get group members to buy into
the process.
- Participating
(S3): In
this approach, the leader offers less direction and allows members of the
group to take a more active role in coming up with ideas and making decisions.
- Delegating
(S4): This style
is characterized by a less involved, hands-off approach to leadership.
Group members tend to make most of the decisions and take most of the
responsibility for what happens.
Maturity Levels
The right style of leadership depends greatly on the
maturity level (i.e., the level of knowledge and competence) of the individuals
or group.
Hersey and Blanchard's theory identifies four different
levels of maturity, including:
- M1: Group members lack the
knowledge, skills, and willingness to complete the task.
- M2: Group members are willing
and enthusiastic, but lack the ability.
- M3: Group members have the
skills and capability to complete the task, but are unwilling to take
responsibility.
- M4: Group members are highly
skilled and willing to complete the task.
Matching Leadership
Styles With Maturity Levels
The Hersey-Blanchard model suggests that the following
leadership styles are the most appropriate for these maturity levels:
- Low
Maturity (M1)—Telling (S1)
- Medium
Maturity (M2)—Selling (S2)
- Medium
Maturity (M3)—Participating (S3)
- High
Maturity (M4)—Delegating (S4)
A Flexible Leadership
Model
A more "telling" style may be necessary at the
beginning of a project when followers lack the responsibility or knowledge to
work on their own. As subordinates become more experienced and knowledgeable,
however, the leader may want to shift into a more delegating approach. This
situational model of leadership focuses on flexibility so that leaders are able
to adapt according to the needs of their followers and the demands of the
situation.
The situational approach to leadership also avoids the
pitfalls of the single-style approach by recognizing that there are many
different ways of dealing with a problem and that leaders need to be able to
assess a situation and the maturity levels of subordinates in order to
determine what approach will be the most effective at any given moment.
Situational theories, therefore, give greater consideration to the
complexity of dynamic social situations and the many individuals acting in
different roles who will ultimately contribute to the outcome.
The SLII Model
The Situational Leadership II (or SLII model) was
developed by Kenneth Blanchard and builds on Blanchard and Hersey's original
theory. According to the revised version of the theory, effective leaders must
base their behavior on the developmental level of group members for specific
tasks. The developmental level is determined by each individual's level of
competence and commitment. These levels include:
- Enthusiastic
beginner (D1): High
commitment, low competence.
- Disillusioned
learner (D2): Some competence, but setbacks have led to low commitment.
- Capable
but cautious performer (D3): Competence is growing, but the level of commitment
varies.
- Self-reliant
achiever (D4): High
competence and commitment.
SLII Leadership Styles
SLII also suggests that effective leadership is dependent
upon two key behaviors: supporting and directing. Directing behaviors include
giving specific directions and instructions and attempting to control the
behavior of group members. Supporting behaviors include actions such as
encouraging subordinates, listening, and offering recognition and feedback.
The theory identifies four basic leadership styles,
including:
- Directing
(S1): High
on directing behaviors, low on supporting behaviors.
- Coaching
(S2): High
on both directing and supporting behaviors.
- Supporting
(S3): Low
on directing behavior and high on supporting behaviors.
- Delegating
(S4): Low
on both directing and supporting behaviors.
The main point of SLII
theory is that not one of these four leadership styles is best. Instead, an
effective leader will match his or her behavior to the developmental skill of
each subordinate for the task at hand.
Important Situational
Factors
Experts suggest that there are four key contextual
factors that leaders must be aware of when making an assessment of the
situation. These factors include:
- Leaders
need to consider the relationship between the leaders and the members of
the group. Social and interpersonal factors can play a role in determining
which approach is best. For example, a group that lacks efficiency and
productivity might benefit from a style that emphasizes order, rules, and
clearly defined roles. A productive group of highly skilled workers, on
the other hand, might benefit from a more democratic style that
allows group members to work independently and have input in
organizational decisions.
- The leader
needs to consider the task itself. Tasks can range from simple to complex,
but the leader needs to have a clear idea of exactly what the task entails
in order to determine if it has been successfully and competently
accomplished.
- The level of authority the leader has over group members should also be considered. Some leaders have power conferred by the position itself, such as the capacity to fire, hire, reward, or reprimand subordinates. Other leaders gain power through their relationships with employees, often by gaining respect from them, offering support to them, and helping them feel included in the decision-making process.
- As the
Hersey-Blanchard model suggests, leaders need to consider the
level of maturity of each individual group member. The maturity level is a
measure of an individual's ability to complete a task, as well as his or
her willingness to complete the task. Assigning a job to a member who is
willing but lacks the ability is a recipe for failure.
Being able to pinpoint each employee's level of maturity
allows the leader to choose the best leadership approach to help
employees accomplish their goals.
Thanks for reading my blog.
Are you Leading?
Dr. Deepak A. Patil
CEO, Lead ThySelf
Comments
Post a Comment